THE FLEXURAL STRENGTH BEHAVIOUR OF BALAU AND CHENGAL TIMBER SPECIES USING THE ANALYSIS OF MODULUS OF RUPTURE (MOR) AND MODULUS OF ELASTICITY (MOE) PARAMETERS

Supplementary Files

PDF

Keywords

Chengal
Balau
flexural
SDG9
SDG11

Abstract

Wood is one of the oldest materials used as a major structural element before concrete and steel which has a greater ability to withstand loads. Engineered wood products (EWP) are a new type of wood created by wood engineers to address the increasing need for wood as a building resource. The growing interest in timber beams, aligned with sustainable development goals 9 & 11, reflects the rising demand for building materials that are both sustainable and structurally efficient. The strength of each wood species that has been classified in the strength grade is the most critical issue in the wood structure. The main objective of this research is to determine the optimum strength, modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), and failure of the Balau and Chengal species. For Balau and Chengal wood, the three-point bending test was applied to determine the bending strength for different species. From the results, it is observed that Balau is stronger than Chengal, with a strength of 218.17 kN and 189.05 kN, respectively. Balau has a greater MOR and MOE than Chengal species by 10.29% and 23.27%, respectively. When compared to Balau wood, Chengal wood cracks and deforms more readily when subjected to lesser loads.

https://doi.org/10.35934/segi.v8i2.95

References

Alam, P., Ansell, M. P., & Smedley, D. (2009). Mechanical repair of timber beams fractured in flexure using bonded-in reinforcements. Composites Part B: Engineering, 40(2), 95-106.

Baglietto, J., Kelly, C., & Johnson, C. (2013). Wood Bend Test.

Chan, N., Go, T. F., Moey, L. K., & Chia, C. M. (2022). Short review on renewable energy policy and energy consumption of buildings in Malaysia. Journal of Engineering & Technological Advances, 7(1), 64-82.

Leguillon, D., Martin, É., & Lafarie-Frenot, M. C. (2015). Flexural vs. tensile strength in brittle materials. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 343(4), 275-281.

Menon, P.K.B. (1993). Uses of some Malaysian timbers. Revised by Lim, S.C. Timber Trade Leaflet, No. 31. The Malaysian Timber Industry Board and Forest Research Institute Malaysia.

Mohd-Jamil, A.W. (2021). Mechanical properties of Malaysian timbers: The weighted mean and combined standard deviation values. Technology Bulletin, No. 106, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.

MS758. (2001). Glued laminated timber - Performance requirements and minimum production requirements. First Revision, Malaysian Standard.

MS544: Part 2. (2001). Code of practice for structural use of timber: permissible stress design of solid timber. Malaysian Standard.

Pajchrowski, G., Noskowiak, A., Lewandowska, A., & Strykowski, W. (2014). Wood as a building material in the light of environmental assessment of full life cycle of four buildings. Construction and Building Materials, 52, 428-436.

Pang, S. J., Ahn, K. S., Kang, S. G., & Oh, J. K. (2020). Prediction of withdrawal resistance for a screw in hybrid cross-laminated timber. Journal of Wood Science, 66(1), 1-11.

United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Array